<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Dash Of Web and Mobile Development &#187; ipad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iangclifton.com/tag/ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iangclifton.com</link>
	<description>Discussing trends and technologies in web and mobile development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:06:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Dreaded F-word</title>
		<link>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/06/09/the-dreaded-f-word/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/06/09/the-dreaded-f-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian G. Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iangclifton.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have seen an increasing number of articles on the dreaded &#8220;F-word.&#8221;  No, not the word, the big one, the queen-mother of dirty words, the F-dash-dash-dash word.  I&#8217;m referring to &#8220;fragmentation.&#8221;  Site after site claims that fragmentation is killing the Android platform, but I guess by &#8220;killing&#8221; they mean the same kind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen an increasing number of articles on the dreaded &#8220;F-word.&#8221;  No, not <em>the</em> word, the big one, the queen-mother of dirty words, the F-dash-dash-dash word.  I&#8217;m referring to &#8220;fragmentation.&#8221;  Site after site claims that fragmentation is killing the Android platform, but I guess by &#8220;killing&#8221; they mean the same kind of killing that the Palm Pre did to the iPhone&#8230; i.e., none.    More Android devices are coming out every month, pushing past technology limits, and bringing the OS to more users than ever before.  But fragmentation is harming Android?<span id="more-231"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/05/on-android-compatibility.html">Dan Morill of Google said this:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Because it means everything, it actually means nothing, so the term is useless. Stories on “fragmentation” are dramatic and they drive traffic to pundits’ blogs, but they have little to do with reality. “Fragmentation” is a bogeyman, a red herring, a story you tell to frighten junior developers.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/06/ars-explains-android-fragmentation.ars">Ryan Paul of Ars Technica said this:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>[R]estrictions effectively ensure that all Android devices that are intended to run third-party applications are basically the same with respect to application compatibility. In addition to mandating some consistent hardware specifications, Google has also taken steps to make the Android software more resilient to fragmentation.</p></blockquote>
<p>And yet, we get people like <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/android-fragmentation-is-real/8499">Adrian Kingsley-Hughes of ZDnet saying things like</a></p>
<blockquote><p>[T]here’s already fragmentation of the platform&#8230; For Joe Average, this created an ultra-confusing marketplace where operating system versions changed every few months. It also meant that compatibility issues were inevitable.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently &#8220;Joe Average&#8221; has a tough time tapping on the Android Market icon and then downloading <em>any visible app in the entire market</em>.  Google filters out apps that aren&#8217;t compatible with your device (due to both OS requirements and hardware requirements).  That doesn&#8217;t sound ultra-confusing to me.</p>
<p>The reality is that developers will choose the lowest level of the Android SDK that they can build their apps against to target the largest possible audience.  If a developer makes a live wallpaper, it will only show up in the market for people whose devices support live wallpapers.  So the only real issue is the question of whether manufacturers and carriers will push out the latest version of the OS for their phones.</p>
<p><strong>OS Updates</strong><br />
Undoubtedly, there will be older devices that aren&#8217;t able to handle the latest version, but those aren&#8217;t the high-end smartphones, and they will have prices which reflect that.  As far as the phones that are capable of running the latest version, if consumers see that X manufacturer&#8217;s phones always have the latest Android version within two months, those phones will be popular, especially through word of mouth.  If consumers see that Y manufacturer never upgrades its phones, those phones will be decidedly less popular.  The same is true of carriers.  And, fortunately for Android, the number of carriers and manufacturers behind these devices is not limited, so simple economics will put enough pressure on these companies that they&#8217;ll be eager to upgrade.  We&#8217;re already seeing all the latest Android-based phones coming out with Android 2.1 (even ones that were slated for 1.6), and they&#8217;re all capable of running 2.2.  With the huge performance improvement that Froyo brings, there is a large incentive for manufacturers and carriers to ensure they get Android 2.2 on their devices as soon as possible.</p>
<p><strong>iOS Fragmentation</strong><br />
Anyway, people&#8217;s minds are pretty set on whether fragmentation is an issue or a scare tactic.  I thought it would be useful to point out how this issue affects (or doesn&#8217;t affect) the popular iPhone because you really don&#8217;t hear much about it.</p>
<p>First, the iPhone has some advantages in avoiding fragmentation.  It is made by one company.  The OS is made by the same company.  The phone is limited to a single carrier (in the US).  The phone has very incremental improvements at one year intervals rather than spurtive, frequent improvements.</p>
<p>Despite these steady improvements, there are hardware differences that are further affected by the OS running on the iPad and iPod as well.  Some devices don&#8217;t have a camera, some have a 2mp camera, some have a 3mp camera, some have a 5mp camera, some have two cameras, some have autofocus, and some have flash.  Some support 3G and some only support WiFi.  Some have 412MHz processors, some have 532MHz processors, some have 600MHz processors, some have 1GHz processors, and some we don&#8217;t know.  Some have 128MB of RAM and some have twice that.  Some have a magnetic compass.  Some have a gyroscope.  Some can lock orientation.  Some are 480px wide, some are 960px wide, and some are 1024px wide.  So there is hardware variation because devices <em>must</em> improve, or they will be left behind.</p>
<p>There is software variation too.  Most devices are running a 3.x version, but that will change soon as some devices are able to upgrade to iOS 4 and some aren&#8217;t.  Of those that upgrade, the features supported will differ.  The iPhone 3G devices purchased for $100 a few weeks ago will never officially get multitasking.  Hopefully the poor souls who bought those are able to wait out a two-year contract before realizing how essential multitasking is.</p>
<p>With all these differences, would you call iOS fragmented?  I wouldn&#8217;t, and I wouldn&#8217;t call Android fragmented either.  They&#8217;re both evolving platforms.  Android had some catching up to do when the G1 came out, so it has evolved significantly faster than iOS, but evolution is not fragmentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/06/09/the-dreaded-f-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple iPhone OS 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/04/08/apple-iphone-os-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/04/08/apple-iphone-os-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 03:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian G. Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iangclifton.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.&#8221;  That&#8217;s a quote from Steve Jobs about their lawsuit against HTC (i.e., against Android, really), but I think it applies pretty well to iPhone OS4, as announced today.  Innovation definitely wasn&#8217;t the focus of the event.
The majority [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.&#8221;  That&#8217;s a quote from Steve Jobs about their lawsuit against HTC (i.e., against Android, really), but I think it applies pretty well to iPhone OS4, as announced today.  Innovation definitely wasn&#8217;t the focus of the event.</p>
<p>The majority of the added features are already available in other mobile operating systems, but Steve does an excellent job of getting crowds excited about features they should have had long ago.  Let&#8217;s take a look at the announcements (credit to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/08/live-from-apples-iphone-os-4-event/">Engadget&#8217;s coverage</a>).<span id="more-174"></span></p>
<p><strong>1 &#8211; Multitasking</strong><br />
Steve at least acknowledges that this has been available for other phones for years, but it looks like the multitasking will be pretty limited.  The majority of apps will just do state-saving, similar to the current experience.  Applications can be modified to have specific background services, such as Pandora playing in the background.  I love this quote: &#8220;It&#8217;s no exaggeration to say that the iPhone has changed the future of Pandora.&#8221;  I&#8217;d say iPhone has been holding back Pandora by not allowing it to run while you check email or whatever else.  Finally, this will change for iPhone 3GS and the newest iPod Touch devices this summer (and iPads in the fall).  iPhone 3G&#8230; sorry.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t sound to me like there will be support for background tasks that aren&#8217;t initiated by the user (e.g., having a news app download the latest news in the background based on a time interval).  Widgets would have also been a nice announcement, but they&#8217;re absent as well.</p>
<p><strong>2 &#8211; Folders (and Wallpapers)</strong><br />
Now you can create folders and change your background image.</p>
<p><strong>3 &#8211; Enhanced Mail</strong><br />
Unified inboxes, multiple Exchange accounts, and thread-based organization&#8230; I didn&#8217;t realize they didn&#8217;t have thread-based organization, so that&#8217;s a nice change for Apple users.</p>
<p><strong>4 &#8211; iBooks</strong><br />
This app is now included in the OS.</p>
<p><strong>5 &#8211; Enterprise</strong><br />
This point included re-mentioning of multiple exchange accounts, so that&#8217;s clearly important to some people.  Better data protection, mobile device management, wireless app distribution &#8230; <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/business/preview-iphone-os/">minimal details</a> on this.  Hopefully the wireless app distribution means you don&#8217;t have to deal with any of the certificate hassle, but I doubt it.</p>
<p><strong>6 &#8211; Game Center</strong><br />
Basically this is Xbox Live/PSN, which isn&#8217;t innovative, but it definitely has a lot of potential.  It will be interesting to see how this unfolds.</p>
<p><strong>7 &#8211; iAd</strong><br />
Apparently Steve thinks that current advertising in applications sucks, so they&#8217;ve created iAd.  This adds potential for interaction (sweet, &#8220;punch the monkey&#8221; can finally come to iPhone!).  iAd actually has the potential to be really effective; unfortunately Apple is being extremely greedy and taking 40% of the revenue.  In theory, that leaves 60% to the developer, but there are many cases when ad revenue is shared.  Say a developer earns 50% of ad revenue and 50% goes to company XYZ.  That 50% is now really 30%, so the developer earns less than 1/3 of the profit of the app, pre-taxes.</p>
<p>Play with the numbers some more: a developer who would have earned 33% will drop to 20% (from 1/3 revenue to 1/5).  Apple is going to make more money for their shareholders and developers are going to have a bigger challenge (when they&#8217;re already facing an over-saturated market).</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
Uh, that&#8217;s it.  For most people (well, people who have an Apple device that is less than a year old), this boils down to multitasking and some minor improvements (e.g., folders).  As far as innovation, that is pretty much just iAd.  Other devices have had multitasking, folders, custom wallpapers, thread-based mail organization, book readers, wireless distribution, etc.  If nothing else, this shows that competition is good.  Even if you&#8217;re an Apple fan who dislikes Android, WebOS, etc., you can still acknowledge that their presence is forcing Apple to finally make some improvements, and you don&#8217;t have to make as many excuses as to why your phone doesn&#8217;t have X feature.</p>
<p>Also, some additional (very limited) details are available on <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/preview-iphone-os/">Apple&#8217;s site</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/04/08/apple-iphone-os-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Uses For The Apple iPad</title>
		<link>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/02/02/five-uses-for-the-apple-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/02/02/five-uses-for-the-apple-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian G. Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcasm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iangclifton.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every tech site seems to have a dozen or more articles about the iPad.  Nearly every tech blog has spouted an opinion about the device.  A lot of people are focusing on the fact that it can&#8217;t do most of the things other devices can do.  It can&#8217;t multitask.  It can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every tech site seems to have a dozen or more articles about the iPad.  Nearly every tech blog has spouted an opinion about the device.  A lot of people are focusing on the fact that it can&#8217;t do most of the things other devices can do.  It can&#8217;t multitask.  It can&#8217;t run Flash.  It can&#8217;t fit in your pocket.  Etc.  I thought I would help Steve Jobs out and give some people ideas of what the device <em>can</em> do.<span id="more-96"></span></p>
<p><strong>Shower Power</strong><br />
Although Apple hasn&#8217;t outright said so, the iPad is probably very water resistant.  That means you can take it in the shower with you and have it play music, so you can bless the world with your wonderful shower voice as you sing along in perfect tune.  Have no idea what tune means?  That&#8217;s okay!  Just use the T-Pain auto-tune app!</p>
<p><strong>Fat Chat</strong><br />
The rates of obesity in the US seem to have begun plateauing.  That means we need a new way to burn even fewer calories.  If you thought walking to your computer desk was hard work, fret no more!  You can use the iPad from your couch (or kitchen)!  Perhaps more important is that you no longer have to expend all that energy pressing down physical keys, so you can cut that calorie-burning typing from 30 calories an hour to 15!</p>
<p><strong>Shopper Stopper</strong><br />
Being very &#8220;green&#8221; is an important part of feeling better than everyone around you, so avoid harming a recyclable piece of paper and instead bring your iPad charged with power from a coal power plant.  It can feature your shopping list and pictures of what items look like (in case you can&#8217;t remember what an apple looks like when it doesn&#8217;t have a bite already taken out).  As a bonus, you can use it to explain to other shoppers how they are pissing you off by blocking your ability to shop quickly.</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.iangclifton.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/shopping.png" alt="iPad Screenshot" title="I hate people" width="374" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-98" /></p>
<p><strong>Crime Time</strong><br />
Ever walk through a sketchy part of town at night and feel like you&#8217;d be much safer if you had one of those big, black police flashlights?  No worries!  Just download one of the many &#8220;flashlight&#8221; apps on your iPad and hold it out in front of you.  Why would a criminal risk robbing you when you&#8217;re clearly lighting the way with a $500-$830 flashlight?</p>
<p><strong>Camper Pamper</strong><br />
Ever go camping and wish you weren&#8217;t camping?  Well, now you can almost pretend you aren&#8217;t by watching pre-recorded videos that you&#8217;ve re-encoded and synced on your 4:3 device.  It&#8217;s just like watching TV at home!  If a bear attacks you, just download a picture of a forest fire and hold it out in front of you.  You&#8217;re guaranteed to be safe.  As an added bonus, the iPad doubles as a Frisbee when the battery dies!</p>
<p>Now that you&#8217;re thinking positively, feel free to add your own suggestions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.iangclifton.com/2010/02/02/five-uses-for-the-apple-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
